requestId:684c3e4fa89c00.37166813.
Research on the Official System of “Traditional Notes·King System”
Author: Qi Yihu
Source: “Tianfu New Review” 2021 Issue 3
Abstract: Confucianism is divided into modern literature and ancient literature. The former used “The King’s System” as the classic basis, praised Confucius and advocated the restructuring and legislation, which was a late study; the latter used “The Zhou Rong” as the classic basis, praised Zhou Gong and advocated the revival of ancient times from the Zhou Dynasty, which was a historical study in later generations. History focuses on recording history, preserving the past, and oriented towards the past; learning should guide reality, apply it in the world, and oriented towards the future. Therefore, the Zhou Gong’s system was already belonged to Chen Jian of the old system, and Confucius’ system was a new law at the right time. This article shows through the previous recommendation of the Baohuang.com‘s literature that “The King’s System” is doubled to Confucius in the era. It is very likely to be a reorganized code directly from Confucius, and not only a historical document in the Han Dynasty that records the affairs of the ancient kings.
Keywords: Wang Zhi; Zhou Guan; Modern Literature; Ancient Literature;
Author introduction: Qi Yihu, Ph.D. in philosophy, lecturer at the Marxist School of Science and Technology, the purpose of the discussion is: Political Confucianism.
1. Introduction
In Confucian classics, the “Treasures: King System” and the “Zhou Rong” are the two most detailed documents that record the scriptures and scripts, but the classical positions of the two are very different. First, although they are listed as the Thirteenth Seminary, Zhou Rong is an independent scholar and ranks first among the three gifts, but the Royal System is a “Greeting NoteBaoqing.com VIP” was a compilation; secondly, Zheng Xuan, a master who mixed the literature of ancient and modern times, commented on the three poems. However, he focused on the centralization of the Zhou Dynasty and inherited Liu Xin’s statement. He considered it as the book of Zhou Gong to inherit peace, and defined the “King System”, which had many differences in content, as the old system of Xia Yin, from the perspective of “From the Zhou” and “The King of the Fahou King”, Baoqing.com Experience It is naturally that the value of “Zhou Rong” is higher than that of “The King’s System”; thirdly, later generations trust that “Zhou Rong” was written by Zhou Gong, and “The King’s System” was written by Emperor Wen of Han. It is even more incomparable from the author’s perspective. The addition of the three determines the position of “Zhou Rong” and “The King’s System” in classics. In this regard, Pi Xirui once said in a righteous manner: “If you say that “Zhou Rong” was written by Zhou Gong, it was too high, and if you “The King’s System” was written by Dr. Han, it was too high.” [1]
But with the late Qing Dynasty’s current literature平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有平台有� Who is the king? It is the king of Su. Confucius will write “Year”, first to practice national laws, consider the benefits, and have regulations. The discussions between door students and news were compiled and edited privately, and this article was written. ”【2】Pi Xirui believed: “The King’s System is a large number of modern texts, which confronts the Zhou Rong’s large number of ancient texts. One is the old method of the Zhou Dynasty, and the other is the new method established by Confucius’ “Years”. ”【3】While both Liao Ping and Kang Youwei trust, “The King’s System” is a transcript of “Age”. In contrast, from href=”https://www.taiwanlovelog.com/Penny/”>Baohao.com Yu Kangyou asked about “New Study of the Study of the Secretariat”. The book “Zhou Rong” was said to be created by Liu Xin, so it is worse than “The King” in terms of the year and month of the book or the author’s authority. The classical position was reliable and the classical position fell rapidly. So this time, Liu Xian, who praised the “Six History” and complained, “The Zhou Guan was reduced to the six-nation period book since the work of Duke Zhou, and was reduced to the six-nation period book, and was reduced to the Liu Xin. The King’s System was promoted from the work of Doctor Han to the book of Confucian scholars in Qin and Han, and was promoted to the work of the seventy sons after the 70th son. It was not certain. ”【4】
The above two factions on the rise and fall of “Zhou Rong” and “The King’s System” and “The King’s System” cannot avoid the bias of the current and ancient Chinese. To be fair, Kang You’s accusation of Liu Xin’s creation of “Zhou Rong” was not ineffective in academic terms, but from Luzhi in Han Dynasty to Liu Xian and Liu Teacher Pei’s modern era of “The King’s System” was the institute of Dr. Han The stinging of the stinging may not be consistent with history. According to the six chapters compiled by Confucius, the gifts refer to “The Gift”, not “The Gift” and “The Gift”, which can be seen from the title of the book. “The Journey” was originally named “The Official” [5], and is the same as “The King’s System”. However, according to the “Confucius’s text, the legend or not of “The Tribute” is written by the door. The plan of “[6] is divided into the plan, “Talks” is just a transcript of “Talks”. From the explanation of “Talks·Interpretation” on the six chapters, we can see that “Talks are respectful, the teaching of “Talks”, “Talks are both troublesome”, “Talks are respectful but not troublesome, which is deeper than “Talks”. The “Talks” here should be “Talks” rather than “Officials” “. This can also be obtained from “Zhuangzi” and “Shiji”. “Zhuangzi·National Chapter” says “Zhuangzi·National Chapter” says “Zhuangzi” is practiced with Taoism”, “Zhengzi·Taishigong’s Preface” says “Zhuangzi, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, “Zhuangzi”, is a practice standard that is closely related to self-cultivation, rather than a system of rules and regulations for touching the kings. Therefore, “Zhou Guan” and “The King’s System” should be based on the classical position, not the original text, which can be regarded as a unified level of literature,The argument that Pi Xirui’s “large number of modern and ancient times and confronts two sides” is somewhat fair.
The previous discussions on “The King’s System” were precisely due to the deviation in classical positioning, which led to its misreading of classical content. The most representative one is Zheng Xuan. Because he blindly combines the ancient Chinese texts with the power of the earth, he will Baobao.com RecommendedThe difference in contents of “The King” and “The Zhou Rong” simply handle the differences between the three generations, and regard the two classical views that should be part of the parallel comparison as historical stories that are directed by the seemingly mixed academically, and eliminates the more sensitive exploration and discovery of this tolerance difference, thus concealing many subtle meanings. Therefore, before this article discusses the official system of the “King System”, it is necessary to examine the classical positioning or classical qualitative problems of the book “King System” for the past two thousand years. Only by understanding the qualitative problem first can you develop a useful and reliable quantitative analysis of the content.
2. The year and month of “Travels·The King’s System”
In history, there have been five different sayings about the year and month of “King System”: “First, Confucius and his sons, Qing Kang Youwei, Cheng Daozhang and others were the main ones; Second, Confucius’s descendants or Mencius’s contemporaries The work was dominated by the Emperor Zheng Xuan of Donghan, Qingpi Xirui and others; the third was written after Mencius or in the Qin and Han Dynasty, and the Tang Dynasty Kong and Jiang Yong of Qing Dynasty; the fourth was the Fuhui of the Confucian scholars, the Song Dynasty and Chen Yan of Yuan Dynasty. The fifth was written by the Emperor Wen of Han, and the Donghan Luzhi and the Qing Dynasty Liu of Qing Dynasty. “[7] But the fifth was the fifth theory that was the latest in the time. Inspired by the ancient and skeptical
發佈留言